Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:44

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Do you like wearing short skirts?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Do you think Putin wants peace with Ukraine, or does he want Ukraine?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
ChatGPT outage shows just how many people are using AI at work - MarketWatch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The cloud broke Thursday and it'll happen again - how to protect your business before then - ZDNET
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Horoscope for Sunday, June 08, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Muon g-2 announces most precise measurement of the magnetic anomaly of the muon - Fermilab (.gov)